Critical Review Response

The more you write, the more points you will get. Many of the questions can be answered with very short answers, but that misses the point. You are answering these questions for the benefit of the writer of your paper; short answers won’t help that person much; that person would be better served by full commentary. So back up each of your answers will examples from the paper. Tell why you are giving the answers you are giving. The more you say, the better.

1.       Put your name in the upper right of this paper. Then, for #1, write the name of the person who wrote the paper you are reading. (This paper will be given back to the writer of the paper, but your name will first be removed from the upper-right-hand corner.)

The Introductory Paragraph:

2.       The writer should have started general and worked toward a more specific point. The title of the short story about which he or she will be writing should not appear till near the end of the paragraph. Evaluate how well they followed this direction.

The First Body Paragraph:

3.       Copy the topic sentence. If the paragraph focuses on a single literary term, then the topic sentence should name that term. If the paragraph is not focused on a single literary term, the topic sentence should clue the reader in on what to expect in the upcoming paragraph. How well does the topic sentence perform this job?

4.       The writer was warned to avoid just retelling the story. Anywhere you have two consecutive (or more) sentences that retell the plot (and serve no other purpose but to retell the plot), you have a serious problem. How well did the writer avoid resorting to plot summary?

5.       The writer’s job was to help you, the reader, to understand the story better—in a more literary way. How well did the writer achieve this task?

6.       How well was the incorporating of quotations handled? Do the quotations serve a purpose of helping the writer make the point that he or she was trying to make, or do they just seem to appear randomly? Was the MLA in-text citation handled properly?

The Second Body Paragraph:

7.       Copy the topic sentence. If the paragraph focuses on a single literary term, then the topic sentence should name that term. If the paragraph is not focused on a single literary term, the topic sentence should clue the reader in on what to expect in the upcoming paragraph. How well does the topic sentence perform this job?

8.       The writer was warned to avoid just retelling the story. Anywhere you have two consecutive (or more) sentences that retell the plot (and serve no other purpose but to retell the plot), you have a serious problem. How well did the writer avoid resorting to plot summary?

9.       The writer’s job was to help you, the reader, to understand the story better—in a more literary way. How well did the writer achieve this task?

10.   How well was the incorporating of quotations handled? Do the quotations serve a purpose of helping the writer make the point that he or she was trying to make, or do they just seem to appear randomly? Was the MLA in-text citation handled properly? (See the back of this handout.)

Other

11.   What is your opinion of the writer’s writing ability, their “voice,” their use of sentence structure and vocabulary? In other words, does their writing sound like the writing of a college student? a 10th grader? a 5th grader?

12.   How close to error-free is the paper?

13.   Did the writer of the paper set up the paper correctly? How about the title? (See the back of this handout.)

Firstname Lastname

Mr. Moeller

Name of the Class You Are In

1 January 2015

A Worthwhile Title of Your Paper: Not the Name of the Assignment

            Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx.

            Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx.

            Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx.

            Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xxxxx xx xxx x xxxxx x xxxxx xx xxx xx xxxx xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xxxxx xx x xxx xxxx xx. Xxxxx xxx xx …

 

 

 

MLA In-Text Citation: There are two possibilities:

1.       If the writer’s name appears in the sentence, only the page number will appear in the parentheses: One driver, Peter Cohen, writes that after he was rear-ended, the guilty party emerged from his vehicle still talking on the phone (127).

2.       If the writer’s name does not appear in the sentence, it will appear in the parentheses, along with the page number: One driver writes that after he was rear-ended, the guilty party emerged from his vehicle still talking on the phone (Cohen 127).